Round 2 of tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations

More Monahan March pictures

Round 2 of tax cuts for the super wealthy and corporations passed the House. Call your Senators. People power must counter the power of corporations and super wealthy via their political campaign “donations” — which are more like political investments — and damn profitable ones. This will continue and we’ll be on the defensive — responding, reacting and resisting — forever and ever so long as corporations possess inalienable constitutional rights of persons AND as long as money spent in elections is protected as First Amendment free speech. Did I say forever and ever? Yup. Forever and ever. That is until we end it via the We the People Amendment abolishing corporate constitutional rights and money as free speech. So what are we waiting for?



Portman benefits political investors and himself

Ohio’s own Rob Portman is among the bunch of GOP Senators who will personally benefit from the inclusion of this nifty provision that was not in either the original House or Senate version of the tax bill. And who was one of the Senators on the conference committee that reconciled both versions in a single one soon to be voted on by both the House and Senate? Why, Rob Portman!
Rob also received a cool $900,000 from real estate industry Political Action Committees (PACs) in the 2016 election cycle. So Rob both helped his political donors (more like investors) AND helped himself at the same time.
Republican Senators Will Save Millions With Special Real-Estate Tax Break

Stand up and fight for Ohio on tax bill, Sen. Portman: PD editorial

An already horrific tax bill for the working class and those who rely on federal subsidies for medical insurance may get even worse if Sen. Portman and his Republican buddies have their way and reduce the number of years individual tax reductions will last — to pay for more taxes for businesses. Of course, taxes for corporations plummet under this bill and the estate tax, benefiting the super wealthy, would also be drastically reduced in the Senate version (with the first $22 million exempted) and abolished altogether in the House version. Call Portman office today and share your views. 216-522-7095

Historic Tax Heist letter submission to New York Times


Below is my unpublished letter submitted to the Times on December 3…

To the Editor,

While the Senate tax bill may be in many ways “a historic tax heist” (NYT 12/2 editorial), it’s quite ordinary in demonstrating the power of corporations and the superrich to influence public policy. The blatancy of the influence on the tax bill was greater than normal, but the process is a very old story that has been so common for so long that it’s hardly newsworthy. The public’s will has been for decades, was on this issue, and will forever continue to be virtually ignored due to the bizarre constitutional doctrines that money in elections is equal to First Amendment “free speech” and that corporations possess constitutional “personhood” rights, including the right to lobby and contribute/invest in elections. Until these never-intended constitutional rights are abolished, as proposed by the We the People Amendment, HJR 48, we will indefinitely experience (and read editorials commenting on) the growing disconnect between public interests and needs and public policies that serve corporate and wealthy interests.

Greg Coleridge
Outreach Co-Director, Move to Amend Coalition

Corporations and the Super Rich Tax Democracy


(Photo: Peoples World/flickr/cc)

Trump’s claim that “we are giving them a big, beautiful Christmas present in the form of a tremendous tax cut” is spot on when applied to corporations and the super rich.
by Greg Coleridge


5 Reasons to Oppose Senate Tax Cut/“Health Care” Bill

Senate Health:TaxCut bill

The Senate bill will be voted on this week unless public pressure results in at least 3 Senators opposing it.

Rob Portman from Ohio is one of the Senators who hasn’t yet decided how he will vote. He needs to hear from constituents. Please call both his DC and Ohio offices.
DC: 202-224-3353 | Cleveland: 216-522-7095

1. Maybe the # 1 reason: The bill isn’t a “health care” bill at all, but a tax cut bill
The bill will retain the nearly $1 trillion in tax cuts from the House bill over the next decade. The tax breaks would go primarily to the very wealthy, with 40 percent of savings going to the top 1 percent of earners and 64 percent of savings going to the top 20 percent of earners. The super rich, those earning $100 million a year from investments through stock sales and dividends would no longer have to pay that the Medicare tax that the rest of us pay. Just one example: Republican Party mega donor Sheldon Adelson could see his tax bill cut by about $43 million. Tax cuts will also go to insurance and pharmaceutical corporations.

2. Ending Medicaid as we know it
The bill would roll back Medicaid expansion (affecting 11 million people), cut federal support for the program even more than the House bill, which cut Medicaid by $800 billion. Seventy-five percent of poor children rely on Medicaid. Fifty percent of births in the U.S. are covered by Medicaid.

3. Millions left uninsured
The bill is similar to a House measure that would have left 23 million Americans without health insurance. Incidentally, President Trump called the House version “mean.” The bill would allow insurers to not cover essential services — such as emergency services, maternity care, opiod addiction treatment and mental health disorders

4. Less generous subsidies
Those eligible for insurance would receive less generous subsidies. This would negatively effect older consumers with moderate incomes.

5. Secrecy / lack of transparency
The bill was negotiated behind closed doors by 13 Republican male senators. The public, media, and Democrats and most Republicans in Congress had no knowledge of the bill’s contents during the negotiations. There were no public hearings. A government agency hasn’t yet “scored” or determined the cost of the bill, which was also true of the House bill before it was voted on.

Please call Senator Portman.


REAL persons couldn’t get away with this


Why Microsoft, With $100 Billion, Wants a Loan for LinkedIn

Allowing these entities to invest their foreign holdings in US financial
institutions and Treasuries makes a mockery of the whole tax system. If
they want to avoid US taxes, then they must keep all their cash “owned” by
subsidiaries abroad. The larger issue, of course, is the legal
manipulation of shifting money between “separate” corporations whenever
and wherever convenient to avoid taxes. Actual human persons (which don¹t
include corporations) have no such options — not even those with
schizophrenia. They are still a single entity. Not so with corpses. They
can shift and manipulate their corporate “personalities” and
“nationalities” pretty much at will.

Is giving corporations $85 billion in corporate tax breaks the only way to pass unemployment insurance?


Heller May Try to Attach Unemployment Extension to Tax Cut Bill

Is this what the struggle for extending emergency unemployment compensation has come down to: the only way to pass benefits for millions of people who need to put food on the table and pay the rent so they can look for jobs that aren’t out there is to grant corporations $85 billion in tax breaks?

A majority of Americans support extending unemployment insurance.

A majority of Americans are opposed to more corporate tax breaks.

No matter.

Is this not one or two more pieces of evidence to show as the recent study by Princeton and Northwestern University professors document that our nation is more an oligarchy than a democracy.

Is it any wonder that:
– 70 percent of Americans do not have confidence that the federal government will “make progress on the important problems and issues facing the country in 2014”.
– an all-time high 53 percent of all Americans believe that neither major political party “represents the American people”, AND
– Americans disapprove of the job that Congress is doing by a 77.6 percent to 14.2 percent margin.

And one or two more pieces of evidence to show we need a Constitutional amendment to abolish corporate personhood and money as speech, as advocated by Move to Amend (

In the meantime, contact your Senator and House member — tell them to vote:
NO on granting $85 billion more in corporate tax breaks.
YES on extending emergency unemployment benefits.